Outrageous verdict in the Zimmerman case

Trayvon Martin bildeIn light of the outrageous verdict in the Zimmerman case this evening, I have drafted a post script to my original article titled: Open letter to the family of Trayvon Martin and prosecutor Angela Cory.

Over the last several weeks I have had a chance to see many hours of this trial on television and have paid close attention to many of the instant, self-described, legal scholars/commentators on both sides of the issues raised by this trial.

Spoken and unspoken throughout the trial, and the proceedings leading up to the trial, including the media coverage was a palpable racial tension from the start, going back to 2012 when the Sanford Florida police refused to arrest George Zimmerman for the murder of Trayvon Martin. And then we found, once the long delayed trial began-that the jury that was selected was made up all most exclusively of white folks.

One thing that hit me viscerally as the disbelief of the verdict set in was my commitment to re double my efforts to promote racial justice in a broken criminal injustice system, my long held personal opinion, only magnified 100 fold, as a result of tonight’s verdict and the racially tinged atmosphere that pervaded the criminal proceedings through-out.

Another thought that comes to mind is: How is it that in 2013,in a country that claims to be post racial, (a simplistic notion that I have never given credence to, rejected from the first time I heard the concept, marketed by the media during the post-election celebration, after Obama’s 1st election for president)–that our criminal justice system can still allow for an all-white (maybe one non-white juror)jury…in a case as racially charged from the start, as the one involving Trayvon Martin’s cold blooded murder.

What happened to the requirement that juries represent a cross section of the community, particularly in a case dripping with racial division, controversy and animus.

How is that we let things in our criminal injustice system get so far afield, that Florida allows criminal cases to be tried in front of a jury of 6 not 12

People? In  essence, cutting the guts out of the concept of obtaining a truly diverse cross-section of the community on our juries.

Trayvon Martin’s case is just the latest example of thousands of  criminal cases, that are tried in this country every year–that involve black defendants and black victims of crime, where black jurors are still routinely shut out of the process if not entirely, almost so.

It is the time to insist that juries in this country, that are judging black defendants or black victims of violence (like Trayvon Martin)be judged by at least some if not a majority of black jurors.

This is an idea triggered by a provocative proposal written by Law professor and regular legal commentator, Paul Butler in a law journal article: Racially Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice System, published in the Yale Law Journal in 1995.

In Paul Butler’s piece on race based jury nullification, he quotes Malcolm X in words that seem most appropriate on this night when, yet again—justice has been denied, denied, yet again, along racial lines.

A night when George Zimmerman was acquitted for the execution of 17 year-old African-American Trayvon Martin, a young man whose crime was going to a 7-11 store to purchase candy/skittles for his younger brother, while walking in the rain wearing his hoodie.

“[T}he time that we’re living in now…is not an era where one who is oppressed is looking toward the oppressor to given him some system or form of logic or reason. What is logic to the oppressor isn’t reason to the oppressed. And what is reason to the oppressor isn’t reason to the oppressed. The black people in this country are beginning to realize that what sounds reasonable to those who exploit us doesn’t sound reasonable to us.

There just has to be a new system of reason and logic devised by us who are at the bottom, if we want to get some results in this struggle that is called: “the Negro revolution.” 

** (Malcolm X, Speech at the Leveret House Forum of March 18, 1964, in The speeches of Malcolm X at Harvard. 131, 133, (Archie Epps ed., 1968)

Now is the time to open up a non-stop dialogue on race and our criminal justice system, as the life and integrity of our country now depends on it.

Each of us is now responsible to make certain that no more Trayvon Martin’s are allowed to be demonized and murdered, without a remedy, by a white supremacist criminal justice system.

  1 comment for “Outrageous verdict in the Zimmerman case

  1. aram james
    July 24, 2013 at 10:42 pm

    Excellent opinion piece by Greg Palst..see below



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *