A Federal Court Judge has ruled that Daniel Larson is innocent of the crime he was convicted of and ordered his release from prison. He had already served 10+ years of a 28 year to life sentence for falsely being in possession of a knife and throwing it away.
Numerous witnesses including a Police Chief verified that another man, William Hewitt, was in possession of the knife.
Let me ask you a simple question, should a person who desires to imprison the innocent and let the guilty go free be the Attorney General of California or even a prosecutor?
What kind of person wants to imprison innocent people while allowing the guilty to go free?
It has been two years since Mr. Larson was found to be innocent, two years in which Kamala Harris has continued to persecute him, why?
It is impossible to convict an innocent person of a crime if you don’t want to. The only way innocent people are convicted of crimes is because the prosecutors, the police, the attorney generals, Kamala Harris, want to convict the innocent and thereby let the guilty go free.
Prosecutors, who are supposed to represent the People of California, have no obligation to produce the truth, they only have put on a decent prosecution. Once a prosecution commences anything that would undermine the prosecution’s efforts to achieve a conviction are considered adversarial, including the truth.
Once a prosecutor initiates a case against a citizen, he/she has absolutely no incentive to produce any evidence to the court or the defense that would undermine his/her case in seeking a conviction.
Truth is no longer relevant, only a conviction.
The perversion does not end there.
When police officers commit crimes, does Attorney General Kamala Harris hold them accountable, no!
Through direct evidence I have proven that numerous Palo Alto Police Officers and the Santa Clara County DA violated numerous California Laws in attempting to wrongfully convict me of a crime.
The California Attorney General refused to hold the Santa Clara County District Attorney and the Palo Alto Police accountable despite the overwhelming evidence that the Palo Alto Police and the Santa Clara DA tampered with and destroyed the evidence which would have incriminated them.
Instead of taking control of the case and obtaining the evidence pursuant to Article 5 Section 13 of the California Constitution the California Attorney General allowed the criminals to escape justice.
Why does the Attorney General of California not want to prosecute police officers and district attorneys who violate California Law?
Kamala Harris and prosecutors do not want to prosecute corrupt cops because they want to deceive the public into believing that they are above violating the law.
Kamala Harris and the justice system in general does not believe in the rule of law when the they themselves are the ones who are violating it.
“He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous, Both of them alike are an abomination to the Lord.” Proverbs 17:15