Federal Judges Lucy Koh and James Ware conceal evidence from United States Citizens?

kelly Burger third taser probe

United States Federal Judge Lucy H. Koh and possibly James Ware suppress evidence from United States Citizens in order to conceal crimes committed by the Palo Alto Police and Attorney Steven Sherman:

On March 7, 2011 and April 21, 2011 Joseph (Tony) Ciampi proved to U.S. Federal Judge Lucy Koh that the audio/video recordings and taser gun activation data submitted to the Court by the Palo Alto Police had been edited and falsified.

On May 11, 2011 Judge Koh ruled that it is not a violation of the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause for police officers to falsify evidence/- audio/video evidence and taser gun activation data in order to mislead the courts in order to cover up their own unlawful actions and to falsely incriminate a citizen of a crime. Judge Koh was able to render this ruling by claiming that Ciampi is not allowed to submit evidence that exposes that the audio/video recordings and taser gun activation data has been tampered with. How convenient.

During the June 30, 2011 Sanctions hearing Ciampi once again proved that the audio/video recordings have been edited and falsified in addition to the Taser gun Data Ports and taser gun activation data.

See: http://www.freewillbill.com/four-probes.html

During the June 30, 2011 Sanctions hearing Ciampi proved that Attorney Steven Sherman intentionally and knowingly made false statements to the court regarding the downloading of the taser gun activation data on December 17, 2010. Additionally, Ciampi proved that Attorney Steven Sherman submitted two falsified taser gun weapon summary reports in order to conceal two previous submitted falsified taser gun weapon summary reports.

The tampered taser gun Data Ports and the falsified weapon summaries/taser guns’ activation data indicate that both Palo Alto Police Chief Dennis Burns and Taser International Andrew Hinz are complicit given their submission of evidence and Declarations related to the taser guns and the weapon summary reports.

During the June 30, 2011 hearing Palo Alto Police Lt. Sandra Brown contradicted Taser International’s Andrew Hinz’s December 21, 2010 Declaration stating that taser camera V07-065373 was never sent to Taser International. On July 15, 2011, Ciampi requested that the court, Judge Koh post the June 30, 2011 transcript as the court had done in the past with April 21, 2011 Sanction’s transcript. On July 28, 2011 Ciampi once again requested that the court post the June 30, 2011 Sanction Hearing transcript.

(A side note, Ciampi has requested that Santa Clara County DA Jeff Rosen provide Ciampi with the taser gun activation data that was downloaded by the District Attorney’s office, but Jeff Rosen, a man who claims to be for TRUTH and JUSTICE refuses to provide Ciampi this information). See: http://www.freewillbill.com/da.html

As of August 4, 2011 United States Federal Judge Lucy H. Koh and Chief Judge James Ware refuse to reveal to the American people what Ciampi proved in court in June 30, 2011 by posting the June 30, 2011 hearing transcript, which Ciampi needs to complete preparing his case.

By refusing to post the June 30, 2011 transcript, Judges Koh and James Ware are denying Ciampi beneficial evidence to his case.

On July 5, 2011 Ciampi informed Judge Koh that she violated FRCiv. P. 5(d)(2)(B) by not securing the exhibits submitted to the court by Attorney Steven Sherman on behalf of the Palo Alto Police. As of August 4, 2011, Judge Koh still has not secured the evidence, the exhibits, with the Court Clerk so that Ciampi can inspect the evidence and exhibits and complete his preparations for his case.

“If you haven’t done anything wrong, then you have nothing to hide, thus if you have to hide information from the People of the United States of America, obviously you have done something wrong.” G.P.

Senators Klobuchar and Leahy, I have contacted both Congresswoman Anna Eshoo and Senator Dianne Feinstein to begin the process of investigating my allegations to determine whether Judge Koh’s actions require an impeachment and trial process through the House of Representatives and the Senate similar to what occurred to U.S. Federal Judge G. Thomas Porteous, Jr. Attached are my letters to Congresswoman Eshoo and Senator Feinstein. You should be receiving the attached questionaire from Rep. Eshoo and Senator Feinstein if you haven’t already received one. I look forward to your responses.

Tony Ciampi