This is the claim of Tony Ciampi who has taken on the city of Palo Alto and Tazer International head-on over his being arrested and tazed by the Palo Alto police department back in 2008 and later ruled to have been unconstitutional.
Has Mr. Ciampi found the elusive smoking gun TOP city attorney Donald Larkin claims does not exist thus proving his conspiracy theory of a collaborative cover-up?
Mr. Ciampi claims as reported earlier in the Daily Post that ” they basically manipulated the video”. Mr. Ciampi has been relentless in his pursuit at discovering the truth.
Mr. Larkin on the other hand has an altogether different view point claiming, “we’ve really bent over backwards to provide everything that he’s entitled to and then some”.
Do we honestly believe that any opposing party is going to voluntarily turn over evidence not requested, as Larkin claims – “Everything he is entitled to and then some”. Like a smoking gun?
Let’s not forget that Mr. Larkin was hired to protect the police. Like the two PAPD officers arrested and convicted of DUI’s.
He stuck to his legal guns to protect their identity from be revealed where no other city nationally attempted to cover it up. He did.
Now here’s an interesting twist. The Independent Police Auditors hired by the city of Palo Alto agreed with Mr. Larkin’s conclusions of non-transparency and the right not to know who the drunks were.
This very same team reports directly to PAPD Chief Dennis Burns and refuses to independently investigate Mr. Ciampi’s claim of video and audio manipulation.
They claim, it’s not in their contract. So much for thinking out side box. Are the fox’s Genanco and Miller protecting the city of Palo Alto and Tazer International?
If anyone is going to find out, you can be sure Mr. Ciampi will be hot on the trail which is sure to cause further frustration for Palo Alto’s TOP city attorney Donald Larkin and others.
The guy’s a bloodhound with a legal pit-bull mentality that won’t give up until justice as been served.
His exposing and thought provoking provocative emails have been relentless as well. In fact, they stretch beyond US borders to locate that proverbial smoking gun and now claims he’s found it domestically.
He’s also looking further to hold all those accountable for hiding the truth as noted in his most recent email dated 2/8/2011 addressed to Jeff Rosen – Santa Clara County District Attorney and Loretta King US Deputy Assistant Attorney General – U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division reveals.
Attached is direct evidence of the Palo Alto Police sending Taser International the Taser Cameras that actually recorded the March 15, 2008 incident and sending the Santa Clara County Crime Lab two Taser Cameras that did not record the March 15, 2008 incident. That is direct evidence of violating PC 132, 134 and 141b. The culpable individuals from Taser International can be charged with Conspiracy 182 (a)(1)(2)(3)(5).
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Office of the Assistant Attorney General, Main
Washington, D.C. 20530
Attached is the direct evidence of Taser International conspiring with the Palo Alto Police Department in order to deprive me of my Constitutional Rights by destroying exculpatory evidence during my criminal case.
Andrew Hinz of Taser International is on record stating that Taser International received the actual Taser Cameras that recorded the March 15, 2008 incident and then replaced them on November 26, 2008 with two new Taser Cameras prior to my trial which is a violation of U.S.C. 241.
The reason why Mr. Kobzanets and the FBI could not validate my allegations is because the Palo Alto Police Department gave them edited videos from cameras that did not record the March 15, 2008 incident.
If the DOJ were to bring down conspiracy charges against the culpable members of Taser International, I’m certain they would hand over the original videos as a plea deal to obtain a lighter sentence.
Additionally, there is good reason to believe that the PAPD has sent Taser International, Andrew Hinz, the Taser guns in order to tamper with the taser gun Data Ports. See Court Documents, 121 and 122 of C09-02655-San Jose California.
Taser Intenational Protects the Lie Video and Destroys the Truth
§ 241. Conspiracy against rights
§ 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law
Preventing abuse of this authority, however, is equally necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. “Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.
Excessive force: In making arrests, maintaining order, and defending life, law enforcement officers are allowed to use whatever force is “reasonably” necessary. The breadth and scope of the use of force is vast—from just the physical presence of the officer…to the use of deadly force. Violations of federal law occur when it can be shown that the force used was willfully “unreasonable” or “excessive.”
Fabricating evidence against or falsely arresting an individual also violates the color of law statute, taking away the person’s rights of due process and unreasonable seizure. In the case of deprivation of property, the color of law statute would be violated by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining a person’s property, which oversteps or misapplies the official’s authority.
It is a felony in California to fabricate evidence in order to falsely and wrongfully incriminate someone of a crime, PC 132, 134 and 141b
§ 4. Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Joseph (Tony) Ciampi
P.O. Box 1681
Palo Alto, CA 94302
Mr. Ciampi’s smoking gun evidence and alleged claims are referenced below and it should be noted Mr. Ciampi’s emails for assistance for the most part have been ignored.